Crypto Price & Market Analysis MCP Server
The Crypto Price & Market Analysis MCP Server provides comprehensive cryptocurrency analysis using the CoinCap API, offering:
Get current price and 24h stats: Retrieve current price, 24-hour price change, trading volume, market cap, and rank for any cryptocurrency.
Get detailed market analysis: Analyze top exchanges by volume, price variations, volume distribution, and VWAP.
Get historical price analysis: Access customizable historical price data (5min to 1 day intervals) for up to 30 days, including trend analysis, volatility metrics, and high/low price ranges.
Requires a cryptocurrency symbol for all analysis types. For historical analysis, you can specify the number of days (default 7) and interval (default h1).
Provides real-time price data, 24-hour stats, market analysis, and historical price trends for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies through the CoinCap API.
Allows installation and execution of the MCP server using npm packages, with download statistics tracked through NPM.
Displays badge information about npm downloads using the Shields.io service.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Crypto Price & Market Analysis MCP Serverwhat's the current price of Bitcoin?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Crypto Price & Market Analysis MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive cryptocurrency analysis using the CoinCap API. This server offers real-time price data, market analysis, and historical trends through an easy-to-use interface. Supports both STDIO and Streamable HTTP transports.
Requirements
Node.js 22.14+
CoinCap API key via
COINCAP_API_KEY
Related MCP server: mcp-coincap-jj
What's New
BREAKING: CoinCap v2 API removed. Now uses v3 API exclusively. A
COINCAP_API_KEYis required (free tier available at pro.coincap.io/dashboard)Streamable HTTP transport added (while keeping STDIO compatibility)
Smithery CLI scripts to build and run the HTTP server
6 new tools:
assets-search,market-global,assets-compare,analysis-candlestick,price-convert,assets-infoHierarchical tool naming: All tools organized into category-prefixed names (
price-*,market-*,assets-*,analysis-*)Output schemas: All tools now declare
outputSchemawithstructuredContentfor type-safe responsesMCP best practices:
isErrorflag on validation errors, server description, andasset://{symbol}resource template
Usage
Add this configuration to your Claude Desktop config file:
MacOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp-crypto-price": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "mcp-crypto-price"],
"env": {
"COINCAP_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY_HERE"
}
}
}
}If your MCP client requires launching via cmd.exe on Windows:
{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp-crypto-price": {
"command": "cmd",
"args": ["/c", "npx", "-y", "mcp-crypto-price"],
"env": {
"COINCAP_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY_HERE"
}
}
}
}Development scripts
pnpm dev # Development (HTTP server with hot reload via Smithery CLI)
pnpm build # Compile TypeScript → dist/
pnpm format # Format source files with Prettier
pnpm lint # Check for lint errors (ESLint + typescript-eslint)
pnpm lint:fix # Auto-fix lint errors
pnpm types:check # TypeScript type-check without emitting files
pnpm test # Run all tests with Vitest
pnpm test:coverage # Run tests with coverage report (Vitest)
pnpm inspector # Open MCP inspector for interactive debuggingRun as Streamable HTTP server
You can run the server over HTTP for environments that support MCP over HTTP streaming.
Dev server (recommended during development):
pnpm devBuild and run the HTTP server:
# Build (outputs to dist/)
pnpm build
# Start the HTTP server
pnpm start:httpBuild and run the STDIO server:
# Build (outputs to dist/)
pnpm build
# Start the STDIO server
pnpm start:stdioThe server listens on port 3000 by default (override with PORT). For clients that connect over HTTP (e.g. Smithery, Claude.ai), pass your API key as a query parameter:
http://localhost:3000/mcp?COINCAP_API_KEY=YOUR_API_KEY_HEREFor remote deployments:
https://mcp-crypto-price.codemonkeyinnovations.com/mcp?COINCAP_API_KEY=YOUR_API_KEY_HERERequired: CoinCap API Key
This server uses the CoinCap v3 API, which requires an API key. A free tier is available.
Sign up and get your API key at pro.coincap.io/dashboard
Add the key to your MCP client configuration:
STDIO: via the
COINCAP_API_KEYenvironment variable (see Usage examples above)HTTP: via the
COINCAP_API_KEYquery parameter in the connection URL (e.g./mcp?COINCAP_API_KEY=your_key)
Without a valid API key, all tools will return an error with instructions on how to obtain one.
Note for Smithery CLI users
This MCP server works directly via pnpm dlx (configs above) and does not require Smithery.
If you do use the Smithery CLI, authenticate with smithery auth login or by setting SMITHERY_API_KEY in your environment. Recent versions of the Smithery CLI do not support passing API keys via --key (or older --profile patterns).
Launch Claude Desktop to start using the crypto analysis tools.
Tools
price-get
Gets current price and 24h stats for any cryptocurrency, including:
Current price in USD
24-hour price change
Trading volume
Market cap
Market rank
price-convert
Converts a cryptocurrency amount into any fiat currency:
Uses real-time price data and USD-based exchange rates
Parameters:
symbol(e.g.BTC),amount(default 1),currency(defaultusd)Example: 2.5 BTC in EUR
market-analysis
Provides detailed market analysis including:
Top 5 exchanges by volume
Price variations across exchanges
Volume distribution analysis
VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price)
market-global
Provides an overview of the entire cryptocurrency market:
Total market capitalization across all assets
24-hour trading volume
Number of active cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin dominance percentage
Top gainers and losers
market-rates
Returns USD-based conversion rates for fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies:
All fiat currency rates (USD base)
Top 10 cryptocurrency rates
Optional
slugparameter (e.g.euro,bitcoin) for a single rate lookup
market-exchanges
Lists top cryptocurrency exchanges ranked by 24h volume:
Exchange name, rank, and 24h volume in USD
Number of trading pairs and market share percentage
Optional
exchangeIdparameter (e.g.binance) for single exchange detailsOptional
limitparameter (1–50, default 10)
assets-top
Lists top cryptocurrencies ranked by market cap, including:
Current price in USD
24-hour price change
Market cap and rank
Configurable result count (1–50, default 10)
assets-search
Searches for cryptocurrencies by name or symbol with fuzzy matching:
Returns matching assets with symbol, name, price, and rank
Configurable result count (1–50, default 10)
Example: search "bit" returns Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, BitTorrent, etc.
assets-info
Returns detailed metadata for a single cryptocurrency:
ID, rank, symbol, and name
Price, 24h change, market cap, and volume
Circulating supply and max supply
VWAP (24h)
assets-compare
Compares 2–5 cryptocurrencies side by side:
Price, 24h change, market cap, volume, and rank for each asset
Comma-separated symbols (e.g.
BTC,ETH,SOL)Highlights best performer by 24h change
analysis-historical
Analyzes historical price data with:
Customizable time intervals (5min to 1 day)
Support for up to 30 days of historical data
Price trend analysis
Volatility metrics
High/low price ranges
analysis-technical
Returns the latest technical indicators for any cryptocurrency:
SMA (Simple Moving Average) with period
EMA (Exponential Moving Average) with period
RSI (Relative Strength Index) with Overbought/Oversold/Neutral signal
MACD with signal line, histogram, and Bullish/Bearish label
VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price, 24h)
analysis-candlestick
Retrieves OHLCV candlestick data for a cryptocurrency:
Open, high, low, close, and volume for each candle
Configurable interval (
5m,15m,30m,1h,2h,6h,12h,1d)Supports 1–30 days of historical candles
Resources
The server exposes the following MCP resources:
info://server— Server name and version metadataasset://{symbol}— Cryptocurrency asset information by symbol (e.g.asset://BTC), returned as JSON
Prompts
The server exposes the following MCP prompts that clients can invoke:
Prompt | Args | Description |
|
| Comprehensive analysis: price, market, historical trends |
|
| Compare 2-5 cryptos side-by-side |
| — | Global market snapshot: metrics, top assets, top exchanges |
|
| Convert crypto amount to fiat |
|
| Exchange landscape analysis for a crypto |
|
| Full technical analysis: indicators, candles, trends |
|
| Search and screen cryptos for opportunities |
Sample Prompts
"What's the current price of Bitcoin?"
"Show me market analysis for ETH"
"Give me the 7-day price history for DOGE"
"What are the top exchanges trading BTC?"
"Show me the price trends for SOL with 1-hour intervals"
"What are the technical indicators for ETH right now?"
"What's the current EUR to USD exchange rate?"
"Which crypto exchanges have the highest 24h volume?"
"Search for cryptocurrencies matching 'sol'"
"Give me a global overview of the crypto market"
"Compare BTC, ETH, and SOL side by side"
"Show me 1-hour candlestick data for BTC over the last 3 days"
"Convert 2.5 BTC to EUR"
"Get detailed info about the Ethereum asset"
"Generate a comprehensive analysis of a cryptocurrency covering price, market, and historical trends"
"Find all cryptocurrencies with 'bit' in their name and show me their current prices"
"What's the market cap ranking and circulating supply of Cardano?"
"Compare the top 3 stablecoins and show which has the highest volume"
"Show me how Bitcoin has performed over the past 30 days with daily candles"
"Convert 100 SOL to GBP and show the exchange rate"
"Give me a full market snapshot: global metrics, top gainers, and BTC dominance"
"What are the best and worst performing cryptos in the last 24 hours?"
"Show me 15-minute candlestick data for ETH over the last 2 days"
"Compare DeFi tokens: UNI, AAVE, COMP, and MKR"
"What's the VWAP and max supply of Bitcoin?"
"Search for layer-2 tokens and compare the top results"
License
This project is licensed under the MIT License
Available Tools
3 toolsget-crypto-priceCInspect
Get current price and 24h stats for a cryptocurrency
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| symbol | Yes | Cryptocurrency symbol (e.g., BTC, ETH) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'Get current price and 24h stats', which implies a read-only operation, but fails to detail critical aspects like rate limits, error handling, data sources, or response format. This leaves significant gaps in understanding how the tool behaves in practice.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's function without unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the core purpose, making it easy to parse and understand quickly, with zero wasted content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete for effective tool use. It does not explain what the return values include (e.g., price units, 24h stats details) or address potential complexities like handling invalid symbols. For a tool with no structured behavioral data, more context is needed to ensure reliable agent invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, with the 'symbol' parameter well-documented. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as examples of valid symbols or constraints. Given the high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate, as the schema handles the parameter documentation adequately.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb ('Get') and resource ('current price and 24h stats for a cryptocurrency'), making the purpose specific and understandable. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'get-historical-analysis' or 'get-market-analysis', which likely provide different types of cryptocurrency data, preventing a score of 5.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as the sibling tools 'get-historical-analysis' or 'get-market-analysis'. It lacks explicit context, exclusions, or prerequisites, leaving usage decisions ambiguous for an AI agent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get-historical-analysisCInspect
Get historical price analysis with customizable timeframe
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | No | Number of days to analyze (1-30) | |
| interval | No | Time interval (m5, m15, m30, h1, h2, h6, h12, d1) | h1 |
| symbol | Yes | Cryptocurrency symbol (e.g., BTC, ETH) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states what the tool does but doesn't mention critical aspects like whether this is a read-only operation, potential rate limits, authentication requirements, or what the analysis output includes. For a tool with no annotations, this is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's purpose with no wasted words. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded, making it easy for an agent to parse quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity (3 parameters, no annotations, no output schema), the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what the analysis returns, how the parameters interact, or any behavioral constraints. For a tool that presumably returns analytical data, the lack of output information is a notable gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description mentions 'customizable timeframe' which loosely relates to the 'days' and 'interval' parameters, but it doesn't add meaningful semantics beyond what the schema already provides. With 100% schema description coverage, the baseline is 3, and the description doesn't compensate with additional insights about parameter usage or interactions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('historical price analysis'), and it adds the customizable timeframe aspect. However, it doesn't explicitly distinguish this tool from its siblings (get-crypto-price and get-market-analysis), which would be needed for a score of 5.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings (get-crypto-price and get-market-analysis). It mentions 'customizable timeframe' but doesn't specify scenarios or alternatives, leaving the agent without context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get-market-analysisCInspect
Get detailed market analysis including top exchanges and volume distribution
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| symbol | Yes | Cryptocurrency symbol (e.g., BTC, ETH) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the tool retrieves analysis but doesn't mention whether it's a read-only operation, requires authentication, has rate limits, or what the output format looks like. For a tool with no annotations, this leaves significant gaps in understanding its behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the purpose without unnecessary details. It avoids redundancy and waste, though it could be slightly more structured by explicitly separating key components like scope or limitations.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of market analysis, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'detailed market analysis' entails beyond top exchanges and volume distribution, nor does it cover behavioral aspects like data freshness or error handling, leaving the agent with insufficient context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, with the 'symbol' parameter clearly documented. The description adds no additional parameter details beyond what the schema provides, such as examples of analysis outputs or constraints. With high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'detailed market analysis', specifying it includes 'top exchanges and volume distribution'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'get-crypto-price' (price only) and 'get-historical-analysis' (historical trends), though it doesn't explicitly mention how it differs from them.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get-crypto-price' or 'get-historical-analysis'. The description implies usage for market analysis details but doesn't specify scenarios, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get-crypto-price focuses on current price and 24-hour stats, get-historical-analysis covers historical price data with customizable timeframes, and get-market-analysis provides detailed market insights like top exchanges and volume distribution. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these tools.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with hyphens (get-crypto-price, get-historical-analysis, get-market-analysis). The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a server described as 'Crypto Price & Market Analysis.' While the tools cover key areas, more comprehensive analysis might require additional operations like trend prediction, exchange comparisons, or portfolio tracking, suggesting a borderline under-scoping.
The tools cover current price, historical analysis, and market analysis, which are core to the domain, but there are notable gaps. For example, there is no tool for comparing multiple cryptocurrencies, fetching real-time alerts, or performing predictive analytics, which could limit agent workflows in a full market analysis context.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Unlock the power of real-time cryptocurrency data with our Crypto Price Insights MCP server.
MCP server giving AI agents one-connection access to crypto & DeFi data: DeFi protocol TVL, stableco
Official CoinMarketCap MCP server: real-time crypto prices, market cap, rankings and exchange data.
Hosted MCP server for live public-data APIs and Skills for AI agents.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides access to CoinMarketCap's cryptocurrency data, enabling AI applications to retrieve cryptocurrency listings, quotes, and detailed information.37
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive cryptocurrency analysis using the CoinCap API. This server offers real-time price data, market analysis, and historical trends through an easy-to-use interface. Updated to use Coin Cap API v33711MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA server that provides real-time cryptocurrency data through the Model Context Protocol, allowing access to detailed exchange information and current cryptocurrency rates from the CoinCap API.161MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides cryptocurrency data tools and resources via an HTTP endpoint. It enables users to fetch real-time market data from Binance, track activity logs, and generate cryptocurrency executive summaries.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/truss44/mcp-crypto-price'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server