Delete a checklist
delete_checklistDelete a checklist from a Trello card using its card and checklist IDs.
Instructions
Delete a checklist from a card.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| idCard | Yes | Card id | |
| idChecklist | Yes | Checklist id |
delete_checklistDelete a checklist from a Trello card using its card and checklist IDs.
Delete a checklist from a card.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| idCard | Yes | Card id | |
| idChecklist | Yes | Checklist id |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose behavioral details such as reversibility, permissions required, or cascading effects. The description only states the action, missing critical context for an AI agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with no redundant information. It is front-loaded and each word adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without an output schema, the description could mention the return value or success indication. For a simple delete operation, it is minimally complete but lacks some context like what happens upon success.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (both parameters have descriptions). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline expectation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Delete', the resource 'checklist', and the context 'from a card'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like delete_card (different resource) and delete_attachment (different resource).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The usage is implied as a standard delete operation, but there are no when-not or alternative tool mentions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/trinknx/trello-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server