trello-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to trello-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis is an MCP Server for Trello that enables interaction with Trello's API through natural language, allowing management of boards, cards, lists, and other Trello resources.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Trello that enables comprehensive management of boards, cards, lists, labels, checklists, attachments, members, custom fields, and search through natural language.269 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Trello that works with any MCP-compatible client -- Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and more. Provides 46 tools covering boards, cards, lists, labels, checklists, attachments, members, custom fields, and search.45269 npm3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceThis read-only MCP server enables users to query Trello data, including boards, lists, cards, checklists, and board activity, through the Trello REST API.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Trello integration, enabling management of workspaces, boards, lists, cards, and checklists through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides read and write access to Trello boards, enabling AI assistants to list, search, create, update, move, comment, label, and archive cards via natural language.15MIT
TDQS
Scored across 36 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource-action pair (e.g., board, list, card, checklist, label, member). Even similar operations like archive_list vs archive_all_cards_in_list are clearly differentiated by the resource they act on. Descriptions further clarify any ambiguity.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_board, get_card). However, there is minor inconsistency between 'add' and 'create' (e.g., add_attachment vs create_board), but overall the pattern is consistent and predictable.
With 36 tools covering boards, lists, cards, checklists, labels, members, attachments, comments, and search, the count is well-proportioned for Trello's feature set. Each tool serves a clear purpose without feeling excessive.
The server covers CRUD for boards, lists, and cards, plus operations on checklists, labels, members, attachments, and comments. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no update label, no add board member), but core workflows are fully supported.