Leave Circle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. 'Leave the current circle' reveals only the high-level intent, but says nothing about whether the action is reversible, what side effects occur (e.g., data loss, notifications), or what 'current' means in context. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the tool's name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, tight sentence that front-loads the action and uses every word. There is zero wasted length and no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter action with an output schema, the description is minimally viable, but it doesn't hint at the return value, clarify the ambiguity with delete_circle_member, or explain the 'current' concept. It's adequate for a simple tool but leaves meaningful gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool accepts zero parameters and schema description coverage is at 100%, so there are no parameter semantics to document. The description need not add anything here, keeping the baseline at 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Leave the current circle.' uses a specific verb (leave) and a specific resource ('the current circle'), and it stands in obvious contrast to sibling tools like join_circle and rename. The wording is clear and unambiguous, and 'current' adds useful contextual meaning. However, it doesn't explicitly distinguish itself from delete_circle_member, which could be confused as admin-based removal versus self-service leaving.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool instead of alternatives like delete_circle_member or join_circle. An agent has no way to know the difference, when not to use this tool, or whether membership type matters.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.