Delete Circle Member

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action, omitting potential side effects (e.g., cascade deletions, permission requirements, reversibility) and any consequences for the removed member within the circle context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with zero filler, immediately front-loading the primary action and object. It is as concise as possible while remaining meaningful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite simple schema and low complexity, the description omits critical context for a destructive mutation: no mention of effects on related data, no prerequisites, no behavioral caveats. An output schema exists but is not shown, so the description still leaves the agent guessing about operational impact.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear parameter description ('member's user ID'). The description adds no extra semantic meaning but doesn't need to, as the schema adequately documents the only parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('remove') and resource ('member from the circle'), making the action unambiguous. It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like leave_circle (self-removal) and change_member_role.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives, prerequisites, or contextual triggers. The description is purely declarative and offers no practical usage cues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.