Skip to main content
Glama
touch4645

export-regulation-mcp

by touch4645

Related Servers

Alternatives to export-regulation-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying Japanese national laws and ordinances via the e-Gov Law API, allowing AI agents to access legal data through natural language questions.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables intelligent search and retrieval of Japanese legal statutes through the e-Gov API. Supports smart lookup of laws and articles with abbreviation recognition, batch processing, and multi-tier caching for high-performance legal research.
      8
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query Japanese public data (laws, corporations, statistics) from official government APIs, returning normalized English metadata with source attribution.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool addresses a distinct aspect of export regulations (laws, annexes, ministerial orders, country groups, user lists, etc.), so the boundaries are mostly clear. Minor overlap exists between country list retrieval and country status checking, and between annex tools, but the specific descriptions minimize confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'export_reg_' prefix + a verb (get, search, check) + a noun describing the target. Naming is uniformly snake_case and the verb-object structure is predictable, making it easy to infer a tool's purpose.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server covers the major operations for export regulation research without being excessively large. The number aligns well with the domain's complexity and the need for specific references and checks.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface provides solid coverage of legal text retrieval, keyword search, annexes, parameter thresholds, country classification, user list screening, and catch-all regulation references. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool for managing or updating data, but as a read-only regulatory reference it is quite complete.