tracesList
Retrieve a list of ABAP traces, optionally filtered by a specific user.
Instructions
Retrieves a list of traces.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user | No | The user. |
Retrieve a list of ABAP traces, optionally filtered by a specific user.
Retrieves a list of traces.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user | No | The user. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description should fully disclose behavior. It only states the retrieval action with no mention of side effects, filtering, pagination, or other characteristics.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is minimal but underspecified. While short, it does not provide enough information to be useful, which is not true conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple input schema and lack of annotations/output schema, the description should clarify what 'traces' are and how this list differs from other trace tools, which it does not.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'user', whose description is 'The user.' The tool description adds no additional semantics beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves a list of traces, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like tracesHitList or tracesListRequests, which also return lists of trace data.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like tracesHitList or tracesStatements. The description lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/toshif1234/ABAP---FS-to-ABAP-Code---TS-Claude-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server