classComponents
Lists all components of a specified ABAP class using its URL.
Instructions
List class components
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | The URL of the class |
Lists all components of a specified ABAP class using its URL.
List class components
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | The URL of the class |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only says 'List class components' with no additional behavioral details (e.g., scope, required permissions, side effects). Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but under-specified. While it is efficient, it lacks necessary detail to be fully useful. Appropriate length but not optimally informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is too minimal to be complete. It does not explain what a class component is, the response format, or any constraints. Needs more context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (url parameter has a description). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states verb 'List' and resource 'class components', but is vague about what class components are and does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'classIncludes'. The purpose is clear but not specific enough.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'classIncludes' or other listing tools. The description provides no context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/toshif1234/ABAP---FS-to-ABAP-Code---TS-Claude-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server