買屋快搜
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@買屋快搜找板橋三房預算一千八"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
買屋快搜
房屋物件搜尋 MCP Server — 讓 AI 幫你找房子。
支援 Claude Desktop / Codex CLI,以及所有相容 MCP 的 AI 工具。
一鍵安裝
macOS / Linux:
curl -LsSf https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tonywang0122/house-search-mcp/main/install.sh | bashWindows (PowerShell):
irm https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tonywang0122/house-search-mcp/main/install.ps1 | iex如果遇到 ExecutionPolicy 錯誤:
# 方法 A:只對這次生效(推薦) powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Command "irm https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tonywang0122/house-search-mcp/main/install.ps1 | iex" # 方法 B:永久放行(需管理員權限) Set-ExecutionPolicy -Scope CurrentUser -ExecutionPolicy RemoteSigned # 然後重跑安裝指令
安裝腳本自動偵測並設定:
Claude Desktop(macOS / Windows 一般版 / Store 版)
Codex CLI(macOS / Windows 一般版 / Store 版)
安裝完成後,重啟應用即可使用。
Related MCP server: mcp-tw-lvr
升級
開啟終端機(macOS: Terminal / Windows: PowerShell),貼上:
uv cache clean house-search-mcp然後重啟 Claude Desktop / Codex CLI,會自動下載最新版。
功能
house_search — 搜尋物件列表(城市、行政區、房數、價格、坪數、屋齡等篩選)
house_get_detail — 查詢單一物件完整明細(座向、建築結構、生活圈步行距離、管理費等)
使用方式
在 AI 對話中直接說:
「幫我找板橋三房 預算一千八」
「台中西屯有什麼降價的三房大樓嗎」
「查一下這間物件的明細:1083GN」
手動安裝
如果一鍵安裝失敗,可以手動設定:
安裝 uv
Claude Desktop — 編輯設定檔:
macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json(Store 版路徑不同,安裝腳本會自動偵測)
{ "mcpServers": { "買屋快搜": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["house-search-mcp"] } } }Codex CLI — 執行指令:
codex mcp add house-search -- uvx house-search-mcp重啟應用
Available Tools
2 toolshouse_get_detailA
查詢單一房屋物件的完整明細。
回傳所有公開資訊,包含:
基本:名稱、地址、城市、行政區、社區、物件類型
價格:總價、單價、土地單價、原始開價、降價幅度
格局:房/廳/衛/開放式數量、所在樓層、總樓層、屋齡
面積:建物/主建物/土地面積、面積明細、是否有陽台
座向:房屋/大樓/窗戶/土地座向
特徵:邊間、暗房、管理方式、月管理費、車位詳情
建築結構:結構、牆壁、每層戶數、用途、使用分區、注意事項
經紀人賣點描述(description 列表)
標籤:規格/設施/生活機能/特色標籤
媒體:照片 URL 列表、格局圖、3D 格局圖、地圖圖片、VR 看屋連結、 AI 導覽、影片 URL、語音導覽
生活圈:周邊交通/學校/市場/醫療步行距離
經紀人:姓名、電話、門市、照片等完整資訊
其他:經緯度座標、關注人數、首次上架日期、分享連結
Args: house_no: 物件編號(如 '1083GN'),從 house_search 結果的 id 欄位取得。 也可傳入物件 URL,會自動提取編號。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| house_no | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explicitly states that it 'returns all public information' and enumerates a comprehensive list of returned categories, making the behavior transparent. It also discloses that a house URL can be passed and the number is auto-extracted, adding input flexibility. This goes beyond a generic 'retrieve details' statement.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is lengthy due to the enumerated return categories, but it is well-structured with a clear opening statement and labeled sections. Each category informs the agent about available data, which is valuable for a detail endpoint. It is front-loaded with the primary purpose first, and the Args section is concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has only one parameter and no annotations, the description provides thorough guidance: parameter source, alternative input, and a comprehensive overview of returned data. The sibling tool house_search is referenced appropriately. There is little ambiguity about what the tool does and how to use it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema only defines house_no as a required string with no description. The description adds substantial meaning: it specifies the format (e.g., '1083GN'), the source (house_search's id field), and an alternative input type (URL with auto-extraction). This fully compensates for the 0% schema description coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a clear statement of purpose: '查詢單一房屋物件的完整明細' (query complete details of a single house object). It specifies a specific verb (query) and resource (single house details), and distinguishes itself from the sibling tool house_search by requiring a single house identifier and referencing house_search as the source for that identifier.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The Args section explicitly instructs that house_no is obtained from house_search results' id field, implying this tool is for post-search detail lookup on a specific property. It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but the reference to house_search provides sufficient contextual guidance for when to invoke this tool versus searching.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
house_searchA
搜尋房屋物件列表。
回傳結構:
total / page / page_size / page_count:分頁資訊
newin_cnt / newprice_cnt / hot_cnt / hot_deal_cnt / bestprice_cnt:各類統計數
items[]:物件列表,每筆包含 id、名稱、地址、座標、總價、單價、原始開價、 降價幅度、格局、加蓋格局、樓層、屋齡、建物/主建物/土地面積、車位、 陽台/景觀/影片/3DVR 旗標、首圖/大圖 URL、標籤、關注人數、社區、分享連結等
Args: city: 城市代碼。Taipei=台北市, NewTaipei=新北市, Taoyuan=桃園市, Hsinchu=新竹市, Taichung=台中市, Tainan=台南市, Kaohsiung=高雄市, Keelung=基隆市, Miaoli=苗栗縣, Changhua=彰化縣, Nantou=南投縣, Yunlin=雲林縣, Chiayi=嘉義市, Pingtung=屏東縣, Yilan=宜蘭縣, Hualien=花蓮縣, Taitung=台東縣 zip: 行政區 zipCode,多個逗號分隔。 台北市: 100=中正,103=大同,104=中山,105=松山,106=大安,108=萬華, 110=信義,111=士林,112=北投,114=內湖,115=南港,116=文山。 新北市: 220=板橋,221=汐止,231=新店,234=永和,235=中和,236=土城, 241=三重,242=新莊,244=林口,247=蘆洲,251=淡水 type: 物件類型,多個逗號分隔。apartment=公寓, building=電梯大樓(B), dalou=大樓(L), huaxia=華廈(M), flat=套房, villa=別墅/透天, store=店面, office=辦公, land=土地 rooms: 房數。3=正好3房, 2-3=2~3房, 4+=4房以上, 2-=2房以下 price: 總價(萬元)。1500-3000=區間, 2000+=以上, 1000-=以下 area: 建物坪數。20-40=區間, 50+=以上, 15-=以下 year: 屋齡(年)。0-10=區間, 30+=以上, 5-=以下 floor: 樓層。2-5=區間, 10+=以上, 3-=以下 tags: 標籤ID逗號分隔。4=有陽台,5=廁所開窗,7=有裝潢,6=有景觀, 102=有電梯,17=近捷運,19=近學校,18=近市場,16=近公園, 12=警衛管理,13=新上架,106=新降價 exclude: 排除條件。4f=排除4樓, sfroofplus=排除頂加, sfdarkroom=排除暗房, sfside=排除邊間 keyword: 關鍵字搜尋(物件名稱),如:面寬邊間、河景 sort: 排序。price-asc=價格低到高, price-desc=高到低, publish-desc=最新上架, diff-desc=降價幅度 status: presale=預售屋, resale=成屋 page: 頁次(預設1) page_size: 每頁筆數(預設20)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| zip | No | ||
| area | No | ||
| city | Yes | ||
| page | No | ||
| sort | No | ||
| tags | No | ||
| type | No | ||
| year | No | ||
| floor | No | ||
| price | No | ||
| rooms | No | ||
| status | No | ||
| exclude | No | ||
| keyword | No | ||
| page_size | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explains the return structure (pagination, statistics, item fields) and parameter filtering behavior, which is transparent about what the tool returns. It does not mention rate limits or authentication, but for a search tool, the read-only nature is clear.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is front-loaded with a one-line purpose, followed by a structured return format summary and a parameter list. Despite its length, every sentence adds necessary detail, with no wasted words. The clear sections and parameter enumeration make it appropriately sized for a tool with 15 parameters.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (15 parameters, varied filter options, output schema), the description is exceptionally complete. It covers all parameters with examples, describes return structures, and provides sufficient context for an agent to call the tool correctly without additional information. The presence of an output schema is leveraged, while the description adds essential parameter details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description compensates by providing exhaustive semantics for all 15 parameters. Each parameter includes allowed values, examples, and context (e.g., city codes, zip mappings, type definitions). This goes well beyond the minimal schema titles and defaults, giving the agent complete guidance for correct invocation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states '搜尋房屋物件列表' (search house object list), which is a specific verb (search) and resource (house object list). It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool house_get_detail by focusing on list retrieval with filters, making its purpose unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides extensive filter details, implying it is used for searching and filtering house listings. However, it does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus house_get_detail, nor does it state exclusion criteria. Usage is implied rather than explicitly guided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
v0.3.1- First observed
house_get_detail - First observed
house_search
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
兩個工具功能明確區分:house_search 用於列表搜尋,house_get_detail 用於單一物件詳細資料。彼此沒有重疊,代理可清楚選擇。
兩個工具皆以 house_ 前綴開頭,後接動詞(search、get_detail),命名模式一致且易於預測。
工具數量僅 2 個,略少於典型 3-15 個的範圍,但對於僅需搜尋與查看詳情的房屋查詢服務而言,已足夠且合理。
涵蓋房屋查詢的主要流程:先透過 house_search 取得物件列表與篩選條件,再透過 house_get_detail 取得完整細節。此為唯讀服務,沒有明顯缺漏的操作。
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Japan geodata: cadastral lot numbers (chiban) and reverse geocoding, for AI agents.
MCP server giving Claude AI access to 22+ NYC public-record databases for real estate due diligence
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to search Airbnb listings with advanced filtering options and retrieve detailed property information through an MCP server interface.21,727 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying Taiwan's real estate transaction registry via web scraping of the Ministry of the Interior's official portal. Enables natural language queries for real estate sales, rentals, and pre-sale housing data.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides real-time, high-quality tender information from Taiwan's government e-procurement website via enhanced web scraping, enabling AI to query and analyze procurement opportunities.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for rental apartment aggregation, enabling geographic polygon search, semantic vector search, and LLM-powered analysis. Integrates with AI agents like Claude Desktop to manage apartment hunting workflows.152MIT