get_syllabus

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as error handling (e.g., missing course_id), authorization requirements, or any side effects. For a read operation, the description should at least confirm it is non-destructive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using two short sentences to convey the purpose and parameter. Every word is necessary, and it is front-loaded with the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the single parameter and the presence of an output schema (so return details are not needed), the description is adequate but minimal. It does not describe what the syllabus content looks like (e.g., text, HTML) or any file path, which might be useful for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description includes 'course_id: The Canvas course ID,' which adds moderate value beyond the schema's type-only definition. However, with 0% schema coverage reported, the description could provide more context (e.g., format, example, or validation rules).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get the syllabus for a specific course,' specifying the action (get) and resource (syllabus). It distinguishes from siblings like get_announcements or get_calendar_events, though it could be more explicit about the scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage context is provided beyond the basic action. There is no guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives, prerequisites (e.g., course must be accessible), or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.