tokportal_get_account
Fetch a delivered social media account by its ID to access managed TikTok, Instagram, or YouTube accounts.
Instructions
Get a delivered account.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Saved account ID. |
Fetch a delivered social media account by its ID to access managed TikTok, Instagram, or YouTube accounts.
Get a delivered account.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Saved account ID. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already convey read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds the 'delivered' qualifier, which implies a filter or state constraint not captured in annotations, but fails to elaborate on error scenarios, access requirements, or return value details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with a single sentence that is front-loaded. However, it omits usage guidance and behavioral nuance, so it is slightly under-informative for an ideal concise description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool with annotations present, the description is adequate but not thorough. It does not clarify the meaning of 'delivered account,' nor does it mention the expected output or error handling, leaving gaps for an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema fully describes the single 'id' parameter with a UUID format and description 'Saved account ID.' The description adds no additional meaning about the parameter, meeting the baseline for 100% schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Get a delivered account,' using a specific verb and resource. It hints at a distinction from sibling tools like tokportal_list_accounts which list all accounts, but it doesn't explain what 'delivered' means, leaving some ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as tokportal_list_accounts, tokportal_get_account_analytics, or other account-related tools. The description does not mention prerequisites or context for choosing this tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tokportal/tokportal-python'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server