tokportal_configure_bundle_warming_terms

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false. Description adds critical behavioral detail: one-shot configuration that cannot be changed, behavior at different account statuses, prerequisites for Coverage and grandfathering, and what happens if Coverage cannot renew. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with core purpose. Each sentence adds value, but the description is lengthy with domain-specific details about Coverage renewal that could be trimmed. Still well-structured and informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers input requirements and behavioral outcomes well, but lacks any mention of the return value or response format. Since no output schema exists, the description should provide minimal output expectations. Adequate but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The tool description repeats the exact count requirement and one-shot nature but adds only marginal context (deferred configuration, sibling comparison). Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already carries the load.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb ('Configure') and specific resource ('niche targets of a count-only Advanced Niche Warming purchase'). Notes 'deferred configuration' which distinguishes from other warming tools. Sufficiently differentiates from siblings like configure_bundle_account and configure_bundle_video.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit context: must provide exactly the purchased number of targets, one-shot limitation, and comparison with 'PUT /bundles/{id}/account' (a sibling). Explains when warming session starts. Does not mention other alternatives like tokportal_generate_warming_terms, but the comparison is sufficient for core usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.