tokportal_get_account_analytics

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and idempotentHint=true, covering safety. However, the description adds no extra behavioral context—it does not explain what a 'compatibility view' entails, any expected output, or limitations. It simply restates the title, providing no value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, succinct sentence fully conveys the tool's basic purpose with no redundancy. It is appropriately sized for a simple getter operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the ambiguity of 'compatibility view' and the lack of an output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what the response contains or why this view differs from other analytics tools. The tool is also one of many closely related siblings, so more context is needed to justify its existence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%—the sole parameter 'id' is fully described as 'Saved account ID.' The description does not add any additional meaning, which is acceptable given the high coverage. The baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Get account analytics compatibility view,' which uses a specific verb and resource. It is clear what the tool does but does not differentiate from siblings like 'get_analytics_account' or 'get_analytics_dashboard,' so it loses a point for lack of distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any specific context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to guess which of the many analytics-related siblings is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.