tokportal_generate_warming_terms

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide no safety profile (all false), so the description carries the burden. It states the tool generates search terms and is free, but does not disclose any side effects, latency, or return format. For a generation tool this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the purpose and immediately followed by actionable usage guidance. No wasted words, all information earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is moderately complex (nested body, multiple params) but the schema documents everything. The description provides essential downstream integration context (where to pass the result) and cost info, which makes it complete for an agent. It lacks output format details but no output schema exists, so it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters are fully documented in the schema (text, count, platform, idempotency_key). The description adds minimal extra parameter context beyond saying the input is a free-text niche description, matching the schema. Thus it meets the baseline but does not elevate it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Generate' and the specific resource 'Advanced Niche Warming search terms', and distinguishes it from siblings by noting the result is passed to other tools (advanced_warming_terms or search_terms) and by the 'Advanced Niche Warming' qualifier.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly explains how to use the output (pass to advanced_warming_terms or search_terms) and mentions that it is free and no credits are charged, giving clear context. It does not explicitly state when not to use it, but the downstream usage guidance is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.