storage_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It accurately describes the tool's behavior as a read-only status check returning sign-in status and storage mode. It does not mention side effects or error cases, but for a simple query this is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the core purpose ('Report whether you are signed in'), and contains no extraneous words. It efficiently conveys the necessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (zero parameters, read-only), the description covers the essential information. The presence of an output schema likely details return values, so the description need not elaborate. However, it could explicitly mention that no authentication is required or that it returns current state without side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so schema description coverage is 100%. The baseline is 3. The description adds no information about parameters (none exist), and the output is not covered by this dimension. It does add meaning about what the tool reports, but that is output-related.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reports sign-in status and active storage mode, using specific verbs ('Report') and resources. It distinguishes itself from sibling storage tools like 'enable_hosted_storage' and 'connect_byos_storage' which perform actions, while this tool is purely a status query.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or context for invocation. While the purpose is clear, the lack of usage guidelines leaves ambiguity for the AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.