update_app_store_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only mentions updating copyright information but does not explain what 'etc.' includes, whether the operation is idempotent, what side effects occur (e.g., resetting review status), or any authorization requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but lacks structured information. It does not front-load key details like required parameters or behavioral notes. While brevity is valued, important context is missing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has three parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the update behavior beyond copyright, potential side effects, or how the version object is affected. 'Etc.' leaves ambiguity, and no prerequisites or return values are mentioned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters are well-documented in the schema. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it only paraphrases the update action. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the verb '更新' (update) and the resource 'バージョンの著作権情報等' (version's copyright information, etc.), making the basic purpose clear. However, it does not specify that this is for App Store Connect version objects or differentiate it from sibling tools like update_version_localization or update_app_info.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as update_version_localization or submit_for_review. The description lacks context about prerequisites, when updates are appropriate, or when other tools should be preferred.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.