get_app_info
Get app details and review status by providing the app ID from App Store Connect.
Instructions
アプリの詳細情報と審査状況を取得します。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| appId | Yes | アプリID(list_apps で取得) |
Get app details and review status by providing the app ID from App Store Connect.
アプリの詳細情報と審査状況を取得します。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| appId | Yes | アプリID(list_apps で取得) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It implies a read operation but does not explicitly state safety, idempotency, or side effects. More detail is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with the verb 'get', and efficient. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low complexity (one parameter, no nested objects, no output schema), the description is adequate but incomplete. It could mention what '詳細情報' entails or the format of the response.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 100% coverage, and the description for the appId parameter adds value by indicating it is obtained from 'list_apps', providing useful context beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves app details and review status. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'get_app_info_detail', which likely has a similar purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_app_info_detail' or prerequisites for using the appId parameter. The description lacks context for proper selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tkn-works/appstore-connect-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server