vibevoice-asr
Related Servers
Alternatives to vibevoice-asr
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables continuous voice conversation with AI coding assistants by locally transcribing speech with Whisper and delivering utterances as text prompts.41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables voice input for AI coding assistants by recording audio, transcribing it locally with Whisper, and optionally typing the text at the cursor position. Supports multiple languages and works with MCP-compatible tools like OpenCode, Claude Code, and Cursor.310 npm1MIT

jackai-stt-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceTranscribes audio files by referencing them in chat, using OpenAI's speech-to-text models locally without uploading audio, and supports speaker diarization.1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables bidirectional voice interaction for Claude Code using local speech-to-text and text-to-speech models optimized for Apple Silicon. It provides tools to listen to user speech via microphone and speak responses aloud through system speakers.16Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first meeting capture and transcription for Claude Code. Records audio from meeting apps, transcribes locally with whisper.cpp, and produces structured notes via Claude.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceVoice interface for Claude Code enabling hands-free, conversational interaction entirely on-device for Apple Silicon Macs. It provides push-to-talk transcription and automatic spoken responses via local AI models.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a unique purpose: checking server status, loading the model, and transcribing audio. No functional overlap, making it clear which tool to use for each task.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (get_vibevoice_status, load_vibevoice_model, transcribe_audio), making them predictable and easy to remember.
Three tools cover the essential operations of an ASR server—status check, model loading, and transcription. The count is well-scoped for the domain without unnecessary extras.
The set covers the core workflow (status, load, transcribe). A minor gap is the lack of an unload model tool, but this does not severely hinder functionality for typical use cases.