set_my_short_description

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as a non-read-only, idempotent, non-destructive operation. The description adds the context that the short description is shown on the profile page, but it does not disclose behaviors such as whether the operation replaces an existing description or how language codes are handled. Given annotation coverage, the description provides modest extra value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence with no unnecessary words. It front-loads the main verb and resource, making it immediately understandable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is too minimal to be fully actionable. It does not clarify the role of language_code or differentiate from similar tools like set_my_description. While the core operation is obvious, critical usage details are missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It mentions only 'short description' which maps to the short_description parameter, but completely ignores the language_code parameter and its optional nature. This leaves a significant gap in understanding the full input contract.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'set' and the resource 'bot's short description', with the additional context 'shown on profile page'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like set_my_description and set_my_name, which address different profile attributes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies its usage by naming the purpose, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this over set_my_description or how the optional language_code parameter is meant to be used. No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned, so guidance is only implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.