delete_sticker_from_set

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, and the description simply restates the action. It adds no additional behavioral context such as irreversibility, permission requirements, or side effects beyond what the annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no filler or redundancy. It is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter destructive tool, the description is incomplete: it lacks any context about the 'sticker' parameter, usage restrictions, or relationship to sibling tools. The low schema coverage and absence of output schema place the burden on the description, which it does not meet.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter 'sticker' with 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain what this parameter should contain (e.g., a file identifier, sticker ID, or set placement). The description adds no value beyond the parameter name itself.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete a sticker from a set.' clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (a sticker from a set). It distinguishes from sibling 'delete_sticker_set' by specifying removal from a set rather than deleting the entire set.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, such as the sticker set existing or the sticker being currently in the set, nor does it point to sibling tools like 'delete_sticker_set' for deleting an entire set.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.