gtm_workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only discloses that the 'list' action returns up to 50 items per page. It omits other behavioral traits like idempotency, permissions, or side effects of actions like 'remove' or 'resolveConflict'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but reads as a run-on sentence listing all actions. It could be more structured with bullet points or sections for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 10 parameters, many nested objects, and multiple actions, but the description is extremely brief. It lacks explanations for what each action does and does not hint at return values (no output schema). Incomplete for such complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, only reiterating the pagination limit already in the 'itemsPerPage' parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description lists specific actions (create, get, list, update, remove, createVersion, getStatus, sync, quickPreview, resolveConflict) and mentions the list action's page limit, clearly stating what the tool does and distinguishing it from sibling GTM entity tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus other GTM tools (e.g., gtm_tag for tags, gtm_trigger for triggers). The description only lists actions without context on selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.