tickory_get_alert_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the basic fetch operation, lacking details on idempotency, error handling, permissions, or any side effects. This is minimal disclosure for a retrieval operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with one sentence, no wasted words. However, it could be slightly more structured (e.g., listing parameters or behavior). Still, it is efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single parameter, no nested objects, has output schema), the description is mostly complete. The presence of an output schema compensates for not describing return values. Slightly missing would be a note that it returns a single alert event object.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema description coverage (event_id described as 'Alert event UUID'), the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so score remains at baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb 'Fetch' and resource 'alert event' with clear identifier 'by ID'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like tickory_list_alert_events (lists multiple) and tickory_explain_alert_event (provides explanation).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have a specific event ID, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like listing all events or explaining events. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.