tickory_explain_alert_event

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It fails to disclose whether the tool is read-only, requires permissions, or has side effects. Only states 'explain', leaving behavioral traits vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is a single concise sentence that clearly states the tool's purpose without fluff. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema (not shown), the description need not detail return values. However, it lacks guidance on when to use this tool over siblings, and does not mention any prerequisites or limitations. Adequate but incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers 100% of parameters with description 'Alert event UUID.' Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema for the single parameter. Baseline score of 3 applies due to high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Explain' and resource 'alert event' with clear scope ('triggered or suppressed'). It clearly differentiates from sibling tools like 'tickory_get_alert_event' (retrieves event details) and 'tickory_list_alert_events' (lists events).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage when explanation of trigger/suppression is needed, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives like 'tickory_get_alert_event'. No exclusions or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.