yapi-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to yapi-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for YApi that enables developers to search, view, create, and update API definitions directly from MCP-compatible IDEs.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for YApi that enables LLMs to manage API interfaces, projects, and categories through natural language, supporting multiple projects and path fuzzy matching.5 npmGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables fetching YApi interface details via a tool, allowing AI assistants to generate API code based on YApi documentation.39 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA server based on Model Context Protocol that parses Swagger/OpenAPI documents and generates TypeScript types and API client code for different frameworks (Axios, Fetch, React Query).1210 npm16ISC
- -licenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that generates API clients from OpenAPI specifications, allowing automated code generation through natural language.144 npm1-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that helps AI agents explore OpenAPI specs, search endpoints, and generate TypeScript types.762 npm10MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
The tool names suggest distinct purposes, but without descriptions, boundaries are unclear—especially between generate_types and generate_api_code, which could be seen as overlapping. read_config and get_yapi_data also share a similar 'retrieve data' feel.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (read_, get_, generate_). The verb is always first and nouns are clear, making the naming uniform and predictable.
Five tools is within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool appears to serve a distinct purpose in the YAPI workflow, so the count feels well-scoped without being sparse or bloated.
The set covers the core YAPI integration workflow: configuration, data retrieval, and generation of types, mocks, and API code. Minor gaps might exist (e.g., no explicit tool for updating or validating data), but the main lifecycle is represented.