get_dashboard_widgets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It does not state that this is a read-only operation, whether it returns an array or a single object, or how errors are handled (e.g., invalid dashboard_guid). The agent lacks key safety and behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the purpose. There is no unnecessary text, but it could be slightly more precise about the output structure. Still, it is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema, the description should explain what 'details' means and whether there are limits (e.g., pagination). It does not mention the return format or handle edge cases. This is incomplete for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter description for dashboard_guid. It simply restates that the tool gets widgets from a dashboard, which is already implied.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'all widgets from a dashboard', with 'details and IDs' indicating the information returned. It distinguishes from sibling tools like delete_widget or add_widget, though it could be more specific about what 'details' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_entity or get_dashboards. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., having the dashboard_guid) or when not to use it. The description does not help the agent decide between this and sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.