No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: single-state lookup, scheduled increases, multi-state comparison, and income calculation. There is no meaningful overlap, and the descriptions reinforce the boundaries (e.g., compare_states explicitly handles 2-10 states while get_minimum_wage handles one).
Three tools follow a clear verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_minimum_wage, list_upcoming_increases, compare_states). The fourth, annual_income_at_minimum_wage, is a descriptive noun phrase rather than a verb-led name, a minor deviation that remains readable and unambiguous.
Four tools is well-scoped for a focused minimum-wage dataset. Each tool serves a distinct query shape (single lookup, temporal listing, comparison, derived income) and none feels redundant or missing at this scale.
The surface covers lookup, forward-looking changes, comparison, and derived annual income, which addresses the core lifecycle for this domain. Minor gaps exist for broader use cases (e.g., historical rates, all-state listing beyond a 2-10 comparison, or locality-level data), but these are explicitly out of stated scope.