ui_diff
Identify differences between two UI snapshots by comparing specified fields.
Instructions
Diff two named UI snapshots.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| before | Yes | ||
| after | Yes | ||
| fields | Yes |
Identify differences between two UI snapshots by comparing specified fields.
Diff two named UI snapshots.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| before | Yes | ||
| after | Yes | ||
| fields | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds no further behavioral context. It does not explain what 'Diff' entails (e.g., output format, side effects).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is only one sentence, which is too brief to convey necessary information. It sacrifices completeness for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and parameter descriptions, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain the return value or the role of 'fields', leaving the agent with insufficient information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage and no parameter explanations in the description, the meaning of 'before', 'after', and especially 'fields' is unclear. The description adds no value beyond parameter names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a clear verb 'Diff' and resource 'two named UI snapshots', making the purpose understandable. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'diff_snapshots'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'diff_snapshots', nor any exclusions or contexts.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/thebtf/netcoredbg-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server