Clear the tracepoint evaluation log to erase accumulated debug output and reset state for new debugging sessions.
Clear the tracepoint evaluation log.
This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.
{
"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"arguments": {},
"name": "clear_trace_log"
}
}| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.17.2Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Minimal annotations (only openWorldHint=false). The description says 'Clear' implying destruction but doesn't disclose irreversibility or scope. Does not specify if it affects only the log or also traces.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One concise sentence with no wasted words. Could add a bit more context, but for a no-param tool it's efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Sufficient for a simple tool with no parameters, but lacks details on whether the action is reversible or what exactly gets cleared. Given the many sibling debug tools, a brief behavioral note would improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so the description doesn't need to cover them. The tool is straightforward with zero arguments.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Clear') and the resource ('tracepoint evaluation log'). It distinguishes itself from siblings like clear_breakpoints or remove_tracepoint.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, side effects, or cases where it would be inappropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.