reddit-intel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses data source (PullPush API) and authentication requirement (none). Since no annotations are provided, description carries full burden. Reveals no destructive behavior, but does not discuss rate limits or pagination. Still informative.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with key info front-loaded. Second sentence lists fields, which is slightly lengthy but not verbose. Could be more structured, but concise overall.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, source, use cases, and returned fields. No output schema, but description lists key fields. Lacks examples or sorting details, but sufficient given parameter descriptions in schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are already documented. Description adds context (e.g., 'Supports separate post and comment search') but does not significantly enhance understanding beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches Reddit posts/comments by keyword and lists returned fields (score, comment count, author, etc.). It distinguishes itself from siblings as the only Reddit-specific search tool, with no similar sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides ideal use cases (sentiment analysis, trend detection, community research) and mentions separate post/comment search. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives, but not needed given unique domain.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.