Skip to main content
Glama

notes_list

List notes from macOS Notes, optionally filtered by folder. Set a maximum number of results to control output size.

Instructions

List notes, optionally filtered by folder.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
folderNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must carry full burden. It does not disclose pagination (limit parameter behavior), ordering, or side effects. For a read tool, minimal but still gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence is concise but overly terse given two parameters and no annotations. Trade-off between brevity and completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Does not describe return format (e.g., list of note objects) or behavior of folder filtering (exact vs partial). Incomplete for a tool with no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, requiring description to explain parameters. It only mentions 'filtered by folder' for the folder parameter, ignoring the limit parameter entirely.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'List notes' and resource 'notes', with optional filtering by folder. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like notes_get, notes_search, and notes_create.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like notes_search or notes_list_folders. Missing explicit context for when folder filtering is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/theHaruspex/macos-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server