hotmart_product_catalog_app

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions the visual elements (cards, piechart, datatable) but fails to disclose key behavioral traits like whether the tool is read-only, its authorization requirements, or any rate limits. As a catalog tool, it is likely read-only, but this is not stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, with a clear front-loaded title ('Catálogo de produtos — visão geral...') followed by bullet-point-like details. Every sentence adds useful information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no input parameters and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context: purpose, visual elements, and usage phrases. It does not mention whether it's read-only or if there are any default filters, but for a simple catalog overview, it's mostly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so the description does not need to explain parameter meaning. However, it adds value by describing the output format (metrics cards, piechart, datatable), which compensates for the absence of output schema. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and the description meets that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it's a product catalog overview with format/status/price/info and includes visual elements like cards, piechart, and datatable. It also provides usage phrases ('lista de produtos', 'catálogo'). However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like hotmart_products_list, which might be a similar list view.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives usage phrases ('Use pra 'lista de produtos', 'catálogo', 'meus produtos ativos''), implying when it should be used. However, it offers no guidance on when not to use it or alternatives among the many sibling tools, such as hotmart_sales_dashboard_app for sales data.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.