hotmart_coupon_manager_app

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It describes a view (DataTable + Metric), but the phrase 'gerenciar cupons' hints at possible management actions without clarification. The absence of destructive hints is ambiguous.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the main purpose. It includes a helpful redirect to the create tool. Minor improvement could be structuring the example uses more clearly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description provides sufficient context for a panel/management view. It references the create tool appropriately. However, it could be more explicit about the difference from the list tool and about possible mutation actions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a single parameter 'product_id' having a basic description. The description adds only context that it is 'de um produto' (of a product), which does not significantly enhance semantic understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a coupon panel listing coupons with validity/discount/uses, and provides example use cases. It differentiates from the create tool but does not distinguish from the sibling hotmart_coupons_list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly tells when to use it (to list/manage coupons) and directs users to another tool for creation. It does not provide exclusions for when not to use it versus the list tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.