Skip to main content
Glama
tejpalvirk

Qualitative Researcher MCP Server

by tejpalvirk

startsession

Initialize a qualitative research session to review active projects, participants, codes, memos, and tasks for focused analysis planning.

Instructions

A comprehensive tool for initializing a new qualitative research session, providing structured information about ongoing research projects, participants, analytical elements, and recent research activities.

When to use this tool:

  • Beginning a new research analysis session

  • Getting oriented to your current research state across multiple projects

  • Planning which research elements to focus on in the current session

  • Reviewing recent research activities and progress

  • Identifying active research projects and their status

  • Exploring available participants for analysis

  • Reviewing your most frequently used codes

  • Accessing recent analytical memos

  • Establishing research context before diving into specific analysis tasks

  • Re-engaging with your research after time away

  • Prioritizing high-priority research tasks

  • Tracking the status of various research activities

  • Understanding sequential research processes

Key features:

  • Generates a unique session identifier for tracking research activities

  • Retrieves and displays recent research sessions with summaries

  • Lists active research projects with status and phase information

  • Provides a sample of research participants with demographic information

  • Presents your most frequently used codes with reference counts

  • Highlights recent analytical memos with type and summary information

  • Formats information in an easily scannable format for quick orientation

  • Integrates with the loadcontext tool for deeper exploration

  • Maintains continuity between research sessions

  • Tracks research session history for progress review

  • Displays high-priority research tasks needing attention

  • Shows status information for key research activities

  • Presents sequential relationships between research processes

Parameters explained: No parameters required - the tool automatically retrieves all relevant context.

Return information:

  • A unique session identifier

  • Recent research sessions (up to 3) with:

    • Date

    • Project name

    • Brief summary

  • Active research projects with:

    • Project name

    • Current status

    • Research phase

  • Sample participants (up to 5) with:

    • Participant name

    • Demographic information

    • Participation status

  • Top codes (up to 10) with:

    • Code name

    • Reference count

    • Code group

  • Recent memos (up to 3) with:

    • Memo name

    • Creation date

    • Memo type

    • Brief summary

  • High-priority research tasks (up to 5) with:

    • Task name

    • Current status

    • Associated project

  • Upcoming research activities (up to 3) with:

    • Activity name

    • Scheduled date

    • Prerequisite activities

    • Current status

Status and Priority Information:

  • Research activities are displayed with their current status values

  • High-priority tasks are prominently highlighted for attention

  • Valid status values include: planning, data_collection, analysis, writing, complete, scheduled, conducted, transcribed, coded, analyzed, emerging, developing, established, preliminary, draft, final, active, in_progress

  • Priority values (high, low) help indicate which tasks need immediate attention

Sequential Process Information:

  • Upcoming activities show prerequisite tasks that must be completed first

  • Research phases are presented in their logical sequence

  • The precedes relation is used to determine activity ordering

  • Sequential relationships help visualize the research workflow

Session Workflow:

  1. Start a research session with startsession

  2. Review the provided context to decide what to focus on

  3. Use loadcontext to retrieve detailed information about specific research elements

  4. Conduct your analysis, adding new elements with buildcontext as needed

  5. End the session with endsession to record your research progress

You should:

  • Begin each focused research period with startsession to establish context

  • Review recent sessions to maintain continuity in your research

  • Identify active projects that require attention

  • Note available participants for interview analysis

  • Consider frequently used codes that may indicate important patterns

  • Review recent memos to reconnect with your analytical thinking

  • Prioritize high-priority tasks for immediate attention

  • Check the status of research activities to maintain progress awareness

  • Consider sequential relationships when planning your research activities

  • Use the session ID when using other tools to maintain session tracking

  • After completing a session, record your progress using endsession

  • Establish a regular cadence of research sessions to maintain momentum

  • Use the structured overview to make deliberate choices about where to focus your analytical effort

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It thoroughly explains what the tool does: generates a session ID, retrieves and displays various research elements (projects, participants, codes, memos, tasks, activities), formats information for orientation, and integrates with loadcontext. It details return information structure, status/priority values, sequential processes, and session workflow. However, it doesn't explicitly mention potential limitations like data freshness or error conditions, keeping it from a perfect score.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is excessively long (over 600 words) with repetitive sections (e.g., 'Key features' and 'Return information' overlap, 'You should' reiterates earlier points). While well-structured with headings, it includes unnecessary details like specific status value lists and step-by-step workflows that could be condensed. The core purpose and usage are clear but buried in verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (initializing research sessions with multiple data types) and lack of annotations/output schema, the description is exceptionally complete. It covers purpose, usage, behavioral details, return information structure, status/priority systems, sequential processes, workflow integration with siblings, and actionable guidelines. No critical gaps exist for an agent to understand and use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so the baseline is 4. The description adds value by explicitly stating 'No parameters required - the tool automatically retrieves all relevant context,' which clarifies the parameterless nature beyond what the empty schema implies. This prevents confusion about missing inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool's purpose as 'initializing a new qualitative research session' and 'providing structured information about ongoing research projects, participants, analytical elements, and recent research activities.' It clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools like loadcontext (for deeper exploration) and endsession (for recording progress), establishing it as the entry point for research sessions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a dedicated 'When to use this tool' section with 13 specific scenarios (e.g., 'Beginning a new research analysis session,' 'Getting oriented to your current research state'), and a 'You should' section with 13 actionable guidelines (e.g., 'Begin each focused research period with startsession,' 'Use the session ID when using other tools'). It explicitly positions startsession as the first step in a workflow that includes loadcontext and endsession, providing clear alternatives and sequencing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tejpalvirk/qualitativeresearch'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server