Skip to main content
Glama
tejpalvirk

Qualitative Researcher MCP Server

by tejpalvirk

endsession

Documents qualitative research sessions by recording interviews, memos, coding activities, themes, and status updates in a structured multi-stage workflow.

Instructions

A multi-stage tool for documenting qualitative research sessions, recording analysis progress, tracking coding activities, and creating a structured record of research evolution.

When to use this tool:

  • Concluding a qualitative research analysis session

  • Documenting interview data collection activities

  • Recording newly created analytical memos

  • Tracking coding activities and code applications

  • Documenting emerging themes and theoretical constructs

  • Updating overall project status and progress

  • Creating a structured record of research activities

  • Establishing a formal conclusion to a focused research period

  • Building a historical record of project development

  • Documenting observations and insights from a research session

  • Updating status values for research activities and entities

  • Assigning or modifying priority levels for research tasks

  • Establishing or modifying sequential relationships between research processes

Key features:

  • Provides a structured, multi-stage workflow for research session documentation

  • Records interview data collection in the knowledge graph

  • Captures newly created analytical memos

  • Tracks coding activities across data sources

  • Documents emerging themes and their connections to codes

  • Updates project status information

  • Maintains session continuity with unique session IDs

  • Supports revision of previous stages when needed

  • Offers a comprehensive assembly stage that consolidates all session information

  • Organizes qualitative research activity into a coherent narrative

  • Manages status progression of research activities

  • Tracks priority assignments for research tasks

  • Documents sequential relationships between research processes

The endsession tool uses a sequential, multi-stage approach with typically 8 stages:

  1. Summary Stage: Records basic session information

  2. Interview Data Stage: Documents new interviews conducted

  3. Memos Stage: Records new analytical memos created

  4. Coding Activity Stage: Documents code applications and coding work

  5. Themes Stage: Records emerging themes and theoretical insights

  6. Status Updates Stage: Records changes to entity status values

  7. Project Status Stage: Updates the overall project status

  8. Assembly Stage: Consolidates all information and finalizes the session record

Parameters explained:

  1. sessionId: Required - Unique identifier for the research session

  • Obtained from the startsession tool

  • Example: "qual_1234567890_abc123"

  1. stage: Required - Current stage of the endsession workflow

  • Accepts: "summary", "interviewData", "memos", "codingActivity", "themes", "statusUpdates", "projectStatus", or "assembly"

  • Each stage has specific data requirements and processing logic

  1. stageNumber: Required - The sequence number of the current stage

  • Starts at 1 and typically progresses through the stages

  • Used to track progress through the session documentation workflow

  1. totalStages: Required - Total number of stages planned for this workflow

  • Typically 8 for the complete workflow

  • Provides context for the progress within the overall process

  1. analysis: Optional - Text analysis or observations for the current stage

  • Descriptive text explaining the work done in this stage

  • Example: "Analyzed interview transcripts and identified recurring patterns"

  1. stageData: Optional - Stage-specific structured data

  • Structure varies by stage type:

    • summary: { summary: "Session summary text", duration: "3 hours", project: "ProjectName" }

    • interviewData: { interviews: [{ participant: "P001", notes: "Interview notes", date: "2023-04-15" }] }

    • memos: { memos: [{ topic: "Emerging patterns", content: "Detailed memo text" }] }

    • codingActivity: { codes: [{ code: "coping_strategy", dataItem: "Interview_P001", note: "Applied to discussion of stress management" }] }

    • themes: { themes: [{ name: "Social Support", codes: ["family_support", "peer_networks"], description: "The role of social connections in coping" }] }

    • statusUpdates: { statusUpdates: [{ entityName: "Interview_P003", newStatus: "transcribed", note: "Completed transcription" }, { entityName: "Code_Resilience", newStatus: "established", note: "Well-supported by data" }] }

    • projectStatus: { projectStatus: "data_analysis", projectObservation: "Making good progress on initial coding", priorityUpdates: [{ entityName: "Transcribe_P004", priority: "high", note: "Critical for thematic development" }], sequenceUpdates: [{ before: "Coding_Phase1", after: "Theme_Development", note: "Ready to move from coding to theme creation" }] }

    • assembly: No stageData needed - automatically assembled from previous stages

  1. nextStageNeeded: Required - Whether additional stages are needed after this one

  • Boolean value (true/false)

  • Set to false on the final stage to complete the session

  1. isRevision: Optional - Whether this is revising a previous stage

  • Boolean value (true/false)

  • Default: false

  1. revisesStage: Optional - If revising, which stage number is being revised

  • Required when isRevision is true

  • Indicates which previous stage is being updated

Status and Priority Management:

  • The statusUpdates stage allows for batch updates to entity status values

  • Valid status values include: planning, data_collection, analysis, writing, complete, scheduled, conducted, transcribed, coded, analyzed, emerging, developing, established, preliminary, draft, final, active, in_progress

  • Priority assignments (high, low) can be modified in the projectStatus stage

  • Status changes are tracked to maintain a history of research progression

  • Priority changes help reallocate focus as research needs evolve

Sequential Process Management:

  • The projectStatus stage allows for defining or modifying sequential relationships

  • The precedes relation is used to establish logical ordering between research activities

  • Sequential updates help maintain a coherent research workflow

  • Process sequences can be visualized through the loadcontext tool

When the endsession workflow completes (assembly stage with nextStageNeeded: false), the tool:

  1. Records the session completion in persistent storage

  2. Creates a formatted summary of all session information

  3. Updates the status, priority, and sequential relationships for relevant entities

  4. Preserves the record of research activities for future reference

Return information:

  • JSON response with the following structure:

    • success: Boolean indicating whether the operation succeeded

    • stageCompleted: The stage that was just completed

    • nextStageNeeded: Whether more stages are required

    • stageResult: The processed result of the current stage

    • endSessionArgs: (Only in assembly stage) Consolidated arguments for the session

    • sessionRecorded: (Final stage only) Whether the session was recorded

    • summaryMessage: (Final stage only) Formatted summary of all recorded information

    • error: (Only on failure) Error message describing the issue

You should:

  • Complete all stages in order for comprehensive session documentation

  • Provide specific details in each stage for accurate research documentation

  • Document interview data with participant identifiers and key notes

  • Create descriptive titles for analytical memos

  • Be specific about which codes were applied to which data items

  • Connect emerging themes to their supporting codes

  • Update status values to reflect progress in research activities

  • Assign appropriate priorities to focus attention on critical tasks

  • Define logical sequences between research processes with precedes relations

  • Include relevant observations for project status updates

  • If making a revision, specify which stage is being revised

  • Only mark nextStageNeeded as false on the final assembly stage

  • Review the final summary message to confirm all session details were recorded properly

  • Use the unique session ID consistently across all stages

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sessionIdYesThe unique session identifier obtained from startsession
stageYesCurrent stage of analysis: 'summary', 'themes', 'codes', 'memos', 'participantInsights', or 'assembly'
stageNumberYesThe sequence number of the current stage (starts at 1)
totalStagesYesTotal number of stages in the workflow (typically 6 for standard workflow)
analysisNoText analysis or observations for the current stage
stageDataNoStage-specific data structure - format depends on the stage type: - For 'summary' stage: { summary: "Session summary text", duration: "3 hours", project: "Project Name" } - For 'themes' stage: { themes: [{ name: "Theme1", codes: ["code1", "code2"], description: "Theme description" }] } - For 'codes' stage: { codes: [{ name: "Code1", description: "Code meaning", quotes: ["Quote text"] }] } - For 'memos' stage: { memos: [{ title: "Memo title", content: "Detailed memo text", tags: ["tag1", "tag2"] }] } - For 'participantInsights' stage: { insights: [{ participant: "P1", observation: "Key insight about participant" }] } - For 'assembly' stage: no stageData needed - automatic assembly of previous stages
nextStageNeededYesWhether additional stages are needed after this one (false for final stage)
isRevisionNoWhether this is revising a previous stage
revisesStageNoIf revising, which stage number is being revised
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It effectively describes the tool's multi-stage sequential workflow, revision capabilities, status/priority management, and what happens upon completion (e.g., records in persistent storage, creates formatted summary). It details valid status values and priority levels. However, it lacks explicit mention of error conditions, rate limits, or authentication requirements, though these may be inferred from context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections (purpose, usage, features, stages, parameters, management, completion, returns, instructions). However, it is excessively long (over 800 words) with repetitive elements (e.g., 'Key features' and 'The endsession tool uses...' both list stages). Some details, like the 13-item usage list, could be more concise. While informative, it risks overwhelming the reader with verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's high complexity (9 parameters, nested objects, multi-stage workflow) and no annotations or output schema, the description is exceptionally complete. It covers purpose, usage, behavioral traits, parameter semantics, return structure, and practical instructions. The detailed explanation of stages, status values, and completion outcomes provides all necessary context for an agent to invoke the tool correctly, fully compensating for the lack of structured metadata.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 100% schema description coverage, the description adds significant value beyond the schema. It provides a detailed 'Parameters explained' section with examples for each parameter, clarifies stage-specific data structures with concrete examples (e.g., interviewData structure), explains the purpose of each stage, and notes dependencies like sessionId from startsession. This compensates for the schema's generic descriptions and enhances understanding of complex nested objects.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose as 'documenting qualitative research sessions, recording analysis progress, tracking coding activities, and creating a structured record of research evolution.' It specifies a multi-stage workflow with 8 distinct stages, distinguishing it from sibling tools like startsession (which presumably initiates sessions) and loadcontext (which visualizes sequences). The verb+resource combination is explicit and comprehensive.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit guidance on when to use this tool with a dedicated 'When to use this tool' section listing 13 specific scenarios (e.g., 'Concluding a qualitative research analysis session,' 'Documenting interview data collection activities'). It implicitly distinguishes from alternatives by focusing on session conclusion rather than initiation (startsession) or context management (loadcontext, buildcontext). The guidance is thorough and context-specific.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tejpalvirk/qualitativeresearch'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server