tealfabric_upload_document

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the behavioral burden. It discloses that the file is stored in destination_path using the uploaded file's name, which clarifies the destination behavior. However, it does not mention overwrite behavior, permissions, side effects, or return/error information, which are meaningful gaps for an upload operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler. The primary action and intended use case are front-loaded, and the storage behavior is stated immediately after.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a relatively simple upload tool, the description plus fully documented schema is mostly complete. It communicates purpose, destination semantics, and filename behavior. Missing details such as success/failure responses or overwrite behavior would improve completeness, but the tool is low-complexity and usable as described.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the parameters are already well documented. The description adds little beyond the schema, mainly reinforcing the destination_path behavior and the file-name preservation already present in the property descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Upload') and resource ('Tealfabric documents storage'), and adds the intended use case of publishing built package files for delivery. It is clearly distinguishable from sibling document tools like download, move, delete, and list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit context: use this to publish built package files for delivery. It does not explicitly state when not to use it or name alternative tools, but the purpose is clear enough for an agent to select it for upload-related tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.