tealfabric_create_webapp

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. It correctly conveys the mutating action of creation and the return of a new webapp_id. However, it does not mention lifecycle implications, such as whether the webapp is immediately visible or must be published separately, nor any permissions or constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no filler. It front-loads the core action and immediately provides the key return information, every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an 8-parameter creation tool with no annotations, no output schema, and only 25% schema description coverage, the description is too thin. It provides the action and return ID but leaves agents without guidance on the many optional parameters and their impact on the created webapp.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25%, and the tool description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond the word 'webapp'. Six parameters such as custom_js, custom_css, page_footer, page_header, and page_content have no descriptions in the schema and are not explained in the tool description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Create'), a specific resource ('new Tealfabric webapp'), and the expected return value ('the new webapp_id'). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like tealfabric_list_webapps, tealfabric_get_webapp, tealfabric_update_webapp, and tealfabric_publish_webapp.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies the tool is for creating a new webapp rather than updating, listing, or publishing one. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusion cases, but the create-only context is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.