Skip to main content
Glama
teacat99

gl-mcp-feedback

by teacat99
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to gl-mcp-feedback

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-feedback-enhanced

      EarthChen
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with dual Web UI and desktop application interfaces, enabling AI to confirm with users via prompts and real-time feedback to reduce speculative operations and improve efficiency.
      2
      48 PyPI
      MIT

    • gl-mcp-feedback

      youjunxiaji
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A feedback-oriented MCP server with a Web UI for AI development workflows, enabling interactive confirmations and reducing speculative tool calls.
      2
      3
      MIT

    • mcp-feedback-enhanced

      favtony
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.
      -

    • data_sync_mcp

      Mengzuqing
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling AI agents to request user feedback during tasks, reducing wasted API calls. Optimized for data sync workflows with tools for audience sync confirmation, DMP verification, and rollback confirmation.
      MIT

    • mcp-feedback-enhanced

      Dwsy
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop application for interactive user confirmation, session tracking, and smart prompt management.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: `get_system_info` retrieves environment information, while `interactive_feedback` collects user feedback via a Web UI. There is no overlap or potential for confusion between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent `verb_noun` pattern with snake_case: `get_system_info` and `interactive_feedback`. The naming style is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels minimal. While the `interactive_feedback` tool is heavily featured, the overall surface may be too narrow for a general-purpose feedback server. A few more utility tools (e.g., `store_feedback`, `configure`) could improve scope.

    Completeness4/5

    For its stated purpose (collecting user feedback), the tool set is fairly complete. `interactive_feedback` handles all communication and feedback, and `get_system_info` provides context. There is a minor gap in persistence or configuration, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources