get_forum_discussions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It mentions returning 'title, author, date and the opening message', which is useful. However, it does not clarify the limit parameter's role or sorting order, though limit is implied by 'recent'. More explicit details about default limit and ordering would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three sentences, front-loading the purpose. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, and the structure is clear and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description states the return fields. It covers the required parameter usage and a use case. However, it omits details about the limit parameter and does not mention if the results are paginated. Overall, it is fairly complete for a simple list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must add parameter meaning. It only mentions 'forum_id' in context, but does not explain the 'limit' parameter or its relationship to 'recent'. The description partially covers one parameter and misses the other entirely.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'list the recent discussions of a forum', specifying the verb and resource. It differentiates from sibling tool 'list_forums' by focusing on discussions within a forum and adds context for teacher announcements.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It instructs to use 'forum_id' from 'list_forums' and suggests a use case: 'Good for checking teacher announcements.' While it does not explicitly exclude other uses or mention alternatives, the guidelines are clear and helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.