Skip to main content
Glama
tb8412
by tb8412

Related Servers

Alternatives to QAE-Claude-mcp-example

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Quantitative governance gate for AI agents. Six gates (risk, profit, novelty, complexity, quality, utility) return PROCEED/PAUSE/HALT/ESCALATE with confidence scores and hash-chained, tamper-evident audit trails. Generates NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act Annex IV artifacts. 10 MCP tools; local stdio and hosted Streamable HTTP with a free tier.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local zero-trust permission gateway for AI agents. Enforces policy-based tool authorization, human approvals, scoped permissions, and cryptographically verifiable audit logs.
      4
      77 PyPI
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A pre-action risk gate for AI agents. Your agent calls the forecast tool before any irreversible action — send email, run SQL, make a payment, delete a file — and gets a risk score (0–100) and a GO / CONFIRM / STOP verdict in a few seconds.
      1
      98 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Runtime budget authority for autonomous agents - a set of tools to check, reserve, spend, and release budget before and after every costly, risky operation. The agent asks "can I afford this?" before acting, and reports what it actually used afterward.
      9
      38 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three tools have clearly distinct purposes with no overlap: certify_action evaluates safety for proposed actions, check_budget monitors budget utilization, and get_certification_history retrieves past certifications. Each tool serves a unique function in the safety certification workflow, making selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: certify_action, check_budget, and get_certification_history. The naming convention is uniform throughout, using clear action verbs followed by specific nouns that describe the tool's function.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is reasonable for a safety certification server, covering core operations: certification, budget checking, and history retrieval. While slightly minimal, each tool earns its place, and the count aligns well with the server's focused purpose without being overly sparse.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for the safety certification domain: certify_action handles the primary certification operation, check_budget manages budget monitoring, and get_certification_history offers audit capabilities. This covers the essential lifecycle of certification, budget tracking, and historical review with no obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing