QAE-Claude-mcp-example
Related Servers
Alternatives to QAE-Claude-mcp-example
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA public-safe research prototype for controlling AI-agent tool actions with deterministic policy, risk-based human approval, time-bound authorization and a tamper-evident audit chain.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceQuantitative governance gate for AI agents. Six gates (risk, profit, novelty, complexity, quality, utility) return PROCEED/PAUSE/HALT/ESCALATE with confidence scores and hash-chained, tamper-evident audit trails. Generates NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act Annex IV artifacts. 10 MCP tools; local stdio and hosted Streamable HTTP with a free tier.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal zero-trust permission gateway for AI agents. Enforces policy-based tool authorization, human approvals, scoped permissions, and cryptographically verifiable audit logs.477 PyPI5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA pre-action risk gate for AI agents. Your agent calls the forecast tool before any irreversible action — send email, run SQL, make a payment, delete a file — and gets a risk score (0–100) and a GO / CONFIRM / STOP verdict in a few seconds.198 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGates agent tool execution with human approval, audit trails, and replay-resistant permits, enabling safe use of tools in agent loops.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRuntime budget authority for autonomous agents - a set of tools to check, reserve, spend, and release budget before and after every costly, risky operation. The agent asks "can I afford this?" before acting, and reports what it actually used afterward.938 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools have clearly distinct purposes with no overlap: certify_action evaluates safety for proposed actions, check_budget monitors budget utilization, and get_certification_history retrieves past certifications. Each tool serves a unique function in the safety certification workflow, making selection straightforward for an agent.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: certify_action, check_budget, and get_certification_history. The naming convention is uniform throughout, using clear action verbs followed by specific nouns that describe the tool's function.
Three tools is reasonable for a safety certification server, covering core operations: certification, budget checking, and history retrieval. While slightly minimal, each tool earns its place, and the count aligns well with the server's focused purpose without being overly sparse.
The tool set provides complete coverage for the safety certification domain: certify_action handles the primary certification operation, check_budget manages budget monitoring, and get_certification_history offers audit capabilities. This covers the essential lifecycle of certification, budget tracking, and historical review with no obvious gaps.