permitd MCP Server
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@permitd MCP ServerPropose sending a message to alice saying hello"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
permitd
Governed tool execution for agent loops.

Your agent loop wants to send the email, write the file, hit the API. You want a human decision in between — one that the model cannot skip, replay, or bend to different arguments — and a line in an audit log either way. (THREAT_MODEL.md says exactly when that is a boundary and when it is a guardrail.)
propose(tool, args) ──> permit (signed, TTL, single-use)
──> approve (a human, out-of-band: CLI, or any callable)
──> execute (verify + burn, atomically)
──> one audit line lands (append-only JSONL)permitd is that flow as a small, stdlib-only Python library. It is also loop state: the permit lives in SQLite, so a call proposed in turn N of your agent loop is approved from another terminal and executed in turn N+K — across restarts, across processes.
Every non-execute outcome is fail-closed. A missing, expired, denied, tampered, argument-mismatched, or already-used permit is refused, and the refusal is audited too.
Install
pip install permitdPython ≥ 3.10, zero dependencies.
Related MCP server: AgentGate
Sixty seconds, two terminals
Terminal 1 — the agent side (agent.py):
import time
from permitd import Gate, RED
gate = Gate(db="permitd.db")
@gate.tool(tier=RED, description="send a message to someone")
def send_message(to, body):
return f"delivered to {to}: {body!r}"
args = {"to": "alice", "body": "hello from the loop"}
r = gate.call("send_message", args)
print(r.error) # "... permit PRM-xxxx is proposed ..."
pid = r.permit["id"]
while gate.get(pid).status == "proposed": # this state survives restarts
time.sleep(1)
r = gate.call("send_message", args, permit_id=pid)
print(r.result if r.ok else r.error)python agent.pyTerminal 2 — the human side:
$ permitd pending
1 pending permit(s):
PRM-3f9c21ab44de [proposed] send_message
args: {"to": "alice", "body": "hello from the loop"}
proposed: 2026-07-29T18:12:03+00:00 ttl: 300s
$ permitd approve PRM-3f9c21ab44de
approved — PRM-3f9c21ab44de is executable for 300s, single use, bound to exactly these argumentsTerminal 1 wakes up and prints delivered to alice: 'hello from the loop'.
The trail:
$ permitd audit
{"ts": "...", "event": "proposed", "permit_id": "PRM-3f9c21ab44de", "tool": "send_message", ...}
{"ts": "...", "event": "approved", "permit_id": "PRM-3f9c21ab44de", ...}
{"ts": "...", "event": "executed", "permit_id": "PRM-3f9c21ab44de", "ok": true}That is the whole product: propose, approve, execute, audit line.
What the permit actually guarantees
Bound to exact arguments. A permit is scoped to
sha256(tool + canonical_json(args)). Approval for "send X to Alice" cannot be replayed as "send Y to Eve" — key order and whitespace don't change the binding; any value change does (args_mismatch).Single-use, atomically. The burn is one SQLite compare-and-swap (
UPDATE ... WHERE status='approved'), so two processes racing the same permit cannot both pass (already_used).Time-boxed twice. A proposal is approvable for
ttl_seconds(default 300); a minted approval is executable for anotherttl_seconds. Unparseable timestamps count as expired.HMAC-signed. Approval mints
HMAC-SHA256(secret, id.binding_hash.approved_at), re-verified at execute time — a store row edited behind the kernel's back fails (bad_signature).Hash-chained audit. Every audit line carries the SHA-256 of the line before it. Edit, reorder, or delete any line but the newest and
permitd audit --verifynames the line where the chain breaks. Anchorpermitd audit --tipoff-host and truncation of the newest lines is caught too. Tamper-evident, not tamper-proof (see THREAT_MODEL.md).Fail-closed everywhere. Anything the kernel cannot positively verify — including "the arguments could not even be inspected" — is a refusal, not a pass. Refusals are audited with their reason.
Tiers
Gate is a small registry with three tiers over the kernel:
tier | meaning | gate |
| read-only over your own state | runs freely, audited |
| external read (search, fetch) | one standing toggle: |
| write / exec / send | per-call permit: the flow above |
If you don't want the registry, use the kernel directly:
from permitd import PermitKernel, SqliteStore, AuditLog
kernel = PermitKernel(SqliteStore("permitd.db"),
secret_path="permitd.db.secret",
audit=AuditLog("permitd_audit.jsonl"))
p = kernel.propose("deploy", {"target": "prod"})
kernel.approve(p.id) # or from the CLI / your own UI
kernel.execute("deploy", {"target": "prod"}, p.id, runner=do_deploy)approve is just a method on a store-backed kernel — call it from a CLI, a
Slack handler, an HTTP endpoint, wherever your human is.
The egress guard
Before any non-GREEN call runs — including at propose time — its arguments
are scanned for credential-shaped content: private-key blocks, Bearer/Basic
headers, AWS/GitHub/Slack/Stripe/OpenAI/Anthropic/Google key shapes, inline
api_key=... assignments, the values of this process's own sensitive
environment variables, and a conservative high-entropy backstop. A poisoned
context that steers a secret into a tool argument is refused before anything
leaves, before any approval card is shown, and the refusal reason names the
matched shape, never the value.
MCP: gate any agent's tools, including Claude Code's
Five-minute walkthrough: docs/quickstart-claude-code.md.
examples/mcp_server/ is an MCP server whose tools go
through the gate. Point any MCP-speaking agent at it and that agent gets
propose → approve → execute + audit with zero agent-side changes: the
agent calls a RED tool, is told "permit PRM-… proposed, waiting for approval",
you run permitd approve PRM-… in another terminal, the agent retries and the
call executes. The audit line lands either way.
Storage
SqliteStore (default, durable, atomic burn) and MemoryStore (tests,
ephemeral) ship in the box. Anything else needs five methods — see the
PermitStore protocol in store.py; keep burn
compare-and-swap or you lose the one-shot guarantee.
The audit trail is a separate append-only JSONL file so it stays
tail -f-able. Each line's prev field is the hash of the previous line:
$ permitd audit --verify
ok — 4 line(s), chain intact, tip 9b1c…e4
$ permitd audit --tip # store this somewhere the writer can't reach
9b1c…e4Writes are best-effort by contract (an audit failure never blocks a call);
AuditLog.dropped counts any lines lost that way.
What permitd is not
Not an agent, not a framework, not memory, not RAG. It has no opinion about your loop, your model, or your prompts. It is the layer that holds the state of "may this run?" across turns — and the receipt after it did. What it does and does not defend against: THREAT_MODEL.md.
Ancestry
Extracted from the tool-governance kernel of brainfoundry-nous, where it runs in production gating a personal AI node's tools. The propose/confirm/execute + audit grammar goes back to hbar.brain.console (2026-03). Design notes: DESIGN.md.
License
MIT.
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Runtime permission, approval, and audit layer for AI agent tool execution.
Supervised API-write gateway for AI agents with policy, human approval and execution receipts.
Human-in-the-loop approval for agent actions, with verifiable action-bound receipts.
Zero-trust gateway for AI agents: score tool calls, verify agent cards, enforce policy, audit.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal zero-trust permission gateway for AI agents. Enforces policy-based tool authorization, human approvals, scoped permissions, and cryptographically verifiable audit logs.45Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceHuman-in-the-loop approval gateway for agent tool calls: agents request, policies decide, humans approve via Slack/Discord/web — with an OWASP-LLM-Top-10-tagged audit trail. Self-hostable.101833MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA public-safe research prototype for controlling AI-agent tool actions with deterministic policy, risk-based human approval, time-bound authorization and a tamper-evident audit chain.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a human-in-the-loop approval gateway for AI agents, enforcing policies and audit logging for MCP-compatible tool calls.Apache 2.0