Skip to main content
Glama
tarhou

Check Point Management MCP Server

by tarhou

Add Access Rule

checkpoint_add_access_rule

Add a draft access rule to the current management session for operator review before committing and installing the policy.

Instructions

Add a new access rule to the current session.

The rule is created with status draft and is NOT committed or installed -- it lives in the current management session only. The orchestrator surfaces the draft to the operator for review, then calls checkpoint_publish_session and checkpoint_install_policy to move it through the lifecycle.

This is typically a human-gated step in a change workflow, reserved for network-policy changes.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesHuman-readable rule name (e.g. "Compensating control: hmi-pack-01 SMB").
layerNoAccess layer name. Defaults to the configured default layer.
actionNoAction verb: one of Drop, Accept, Reject, Inform. Compensating-control default is 'Drop'.Drop
sourceYesSource object name(s). Use `Any` for unrestricted source. For compensating controls the typical value is `Any`.
serviceYesService object name(s) (e.g. "smb", "tcp/445").
commentsYesFree-text justification stored on the rule. Reference the unpatchable CVE / CI and the iTop change ref so a future reviewer understands why the rule exists.
destinationYesDestination object name(s). For compensating controls this is the unpatchable CI alias (e.g. "hmi-pack-01"). MUST be alias-scrubbed.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false), the description reveals that the rule is created as 'draft', not committed, lives only in the session, and surfaces for operator review. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Six lines, each sentence adds value. Purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 parameters and a human-gated workflow, the description covers purpose, lifecycle, usage context, and ties to sibling tools. An output schema exists, so return values are not needed in the description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents parameters well. The description does not add new parameter information beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description explicitly states 'Add a new access rule to the current session', specifying the action and scope. It distinguishes from sibling tools by detailing the draft lifecycle and referencing checkpoint_publish_session and checkpoint_install_policy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'This is typically a human-gated step in a change workflow, reserved for network-policy changes', telling when to use it and implying it's not for automated direct commits. It also references the sibling tools for the follow-up steps.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tarhou/checkpoint-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server