Skip to main content
Glama
tarhou

Check Point Management MCP Server

by tarhou
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Check Point Management MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • checkpoint-mcp

      MSPbotsAI
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Check Point Harmony Endpoint that exposes policy, asset, vulnerability, quarantine, and remediation API methods as MCP tools, with per-request credential isolation and automatic two-step authentication.
      -

    • PanOS MCP Server

      Antxine
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Palo Alto Networks firewalls and Panorama through natural language, including policy inspection, configuration changes, monitoring, and log queries via the PAN-OS XML API.
      91
      MIT

    • Firewall Governance MCP Server

      1182872360
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables firewall policy governance by querying CMDB assets and auditing Panorama/Firewall policies. Supports asset searches, firewall object inspection, and security policy auditing to identify matching rules and configurations.
      -
    • AgentsGate by agentsgate

      AgentsGateofficial

      agentsgate
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely call MCP tools with risk scoring, checkpoints, rollback, and approval workflows.
      2 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct and clearly defined purpose: listing rules, adding a draft rule, publishing the session, and installing the policy. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent `checkpoint_<verb>_<noun>` pattern with clear and descriptive verbs (list, add, publish, install). The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a reasonable scope for a focused policy management workflow. It covers the essential steps but could potentially include a few more without becoming overwhelming.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover the core lifecycle of creating, viewing, publishing, and installing access rules, but lack update and delete operations for individual rules. This may force agents to work around missing functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources