Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpsMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to inspect local and remote repositories through sandboxed tools that surface project overviews, structure, dependency audits, Git churn hotspots, and a heuristic health score. It also supports safe GitHub issue searching and creation with built-in duplicate preflight checks, while blocking sensitive files, binary content, and path traversal attacks.
      43 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to safely execute commands, run tests, and modify project files inside disposable, policy-enforced Docker sandboxes that are isolated from the host machine and its credentials.
      15
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to investigate incidents by safely querying PostgreSQL, triaging GitHub issues, retrieving ERP order data, and sending Slack alerts, with AST-validated SQL and human-in-the-loop safeguards.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to GitHub repositories, pull requests, issues, commits, and code search while enabling repository visibility controls, CI/CD monitoring, sandboxed local filesystem access, and code quality/security analysis.
      13
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to perform workspace-confined file operations, read-only Git inspection, and structured shell commands, while requiring out-of-band human approval for mutations and external executions and maintaining an audit trail.
      14
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect schemas, walk Delta table history, run read-only DuckDB queries, and check data-quality and job-run status safely.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: filesystem search/read, GitHub issues/PR summary, Postgres query/explain, and deployment status. Even the PR-related tools are clearly separated by list vs. diff-summary purpose.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names use consistent resource prefixes (fs_, github_, postgres_, deploy_) and many follow verb_noun, but github_pr_diff_summary and deploy_status are noun phrases without a verb, and postgres_query_readonly mixes verb/noun with an adjective. The pattern is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is a reasonable, focused set for an ops-oriented server spanning filesystem inspection, GitHub workflows, and read-only Postgres access. Each tool has a clear purpose and none feel redundant or superfluous.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main read-only investigation workflows: file lookup, GitHub issue triage and PR diff summaries, Postgres querying/explaining, and deployment status. Minor gaps exist such as no directory listing, no GitHub PR list endpoint, and no database schema introspection, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues