Scored across 24 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes—job management, authoring, pipeline stages, and output helpers are well separated. The only mild ambiguity is between validate_storyboard and lint_storyboard (schema vs. preflight pacing), and between probe/record/render, but descriptions clarify these boundaries.
The dominant pattern is snake_case verb_noun (job_list, get_storyboard_schema, validate_storyboard), which is highly readable. However, several tools use bare verbs (probe, record, render, voice, compose, embed, feedback) and two use abbreviations (qa, gif), creating minor inconsistency.
At 24 tools this is on the heavy side, fitting the '16-25 feels heavy' band. The breadth is defensible given the full pipeline (authoring, validation, rendering, QA, output formats, feedback), but the count is borderline and could be tightened by merging some job-status helpers or utility commands.
The toolset covers the entire demo lifecycle: import/init, storyboard authoring aids, validation/linting, run pipeline (probe/record/voice/captions/compose), QA, output formats (gif/stills/frames/walkthrough), embedding, and feedback. Minor gaps like no direct demo listing or deletion tools exist, but the core workflows have no dead ends.