flag_note_as_outdated
Mark a note as outdated by specifying a reason, helping maintain accurate documentation in your team's knowledge base.
Instructions
Flag a note as outdated in Slite
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Mark a note as outdated by specifying a reason, helping maintain accurate documentation in your team's knowledge base.
Flag a note as outdated in Slite
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose side effects (e.g., reversibility, visibility changes) or any behavioral traits beyond the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence of 6 words, front-loaded with the core action. No unnecessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is minimal but matches the tool's simplicity. However, given the lack of annotations and no output schema, it could benefit from mentioning the effect on the note or when to use it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already describes parameters ('Note ID', 'Reason for flagging as outdated'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Flag a note as outdated') and the resource ('note in Slite'). It is specific and distinct from sibling tools like archive_note or delete_note.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool compared to alternatives like archive_note or update_note. The description does not provide context for tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/takeokunn/slite-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server