Skip to main content
Glama
taehojo
by taehojo

predict_expression_impact

Analyze how genetic variants affect gene expression using RNA-seq and CAGE data. Supports eQTL analysis and expression-related variant studies.

Instructions

Focus on gene expression effects only.

Analyzes RNA-seq and CAGE predictions for expression changes.

Perfect for: eQTL analysis, expression-related variants.

Example: "Analyze expression impact of rs744373"

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
chromosomeYes
positionYes
refYes
altYes
tissue_typeNo

Implementation Reference

  • Core handler function that executes the predict_expression_impact tool logic by setting specific output types for RNA-seq and CAGE, calling the base variant effect predictor, and returning expression-focused results.
    def predict_expression_impact(client, params: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """
        Focus on gene expression effects only.
        """
        params['output_types'] = [
            dna_client.OutputType.RNA_SEQ,
            dna_client.OutputType.CAGE
        ]
    
        result = predict_variant_effect(client, params)
    
        return {
            'variant': result['variant'],
            'expression_predictions': result['predictions'].get('rna_seq', {}),
            'fold_change': result['predictions'].get('rna_seq', {}).get('fold_change', 0),
            'impact_level': result['interpretation']['impact_level']
        }
  • Defines the tool schema including name, description, and input validation schema for variant parameters.
    export const PREDICT_EXPRESSION_IMPACT_TOOL: Tool = {
      name: 'predict_expression_impact',
      description: `Focus on gene expression effects only.
    
    Analyzes RNA-seq and CAGE predictions for expression changes.
    
    Perfect for: eQTL analysis, expression-related variants.
    
    Example: "Analyze expression impact of rs744373"`,
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          chromosome: { type: 'string', pattern: '^chr([1-9]|1[0-9]|2[0-2]|X|Y)$' },
          position: { type: 'number', minimum: 1 },
          ref: { type: 'string', pattern: '^[ATGCatgc]+$' },
          alt: { type: 'string', pattern: '^[ATGCatgc]+$' },
          tissue_type: { type: 'string' },
        },
        required: ['chromosome', 'position', 'ref', 'alt'],
      },
    };
  • src/index.ts:176-182 (registration)
    MCP server tool call handler that routes 'predict_expression_impact' requests, validates input, calls the client bridge, and formats the response.
    case 'predict_expression_impact': {
      const params = validateInput(variantPredictionSchema, args) as VariantPredictionParams;
      const result = await getClient().predictExpressionImpact(params);
      return {
        content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify(result, null, 2) }],
      };
    }
  • TypeScript client method that bridges the tool call to the Python backend by invoking callPythonBridge with the 'predict_expression_impact' action.
    async predictExpressionImpact(params: VariantPredictionParams): Promise<any> {
      try {
        return await this.callPythonBridge('predict_expression_impact', {
          chromosome: params.chromosome,
          position: params.position,
          ref: params.ref,
          alt: params.alt,
          tissue_type: params.tissue_type,
        });
      } catch (error) {
        if (error instanceof ApiError) throw error;
        throw new ApiError(`Expression impact prediction failed: ${error}`, 500);
      }
    }
  • Backend Python dispatch logic in main() that registers and routes the 'predict_expression_impact' action to the handler function.
    elif action == 'predict_expression_impact':
        result = predict_expression_impact(client, params)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While it mentions the tool analyzes predictions for expression changes, it doesn't disclose important behavioral traits like whether this is a read-only operation, computational requirements, rate limits, authentication needs, or what format the results will be in. The description provides basic purpose but lacks operational transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized with four sentences that each serve a purpose: establishing scope, stating the core function, providing usage contexts, and giving an example. It's front-loaded with the most important information ('Focus on gene expression effects only') and avoids unnecessary verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of genetic variant analysis, 5 parameters with 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficiently complete. It explains what the tool does at a high level but doesn't provide enough information about parameters, expected outputs, or behavioral characteristics for an agent to confidently use this tool in practice.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage for 5 parameters, the description must compensate but fails to do so. It doesn't mention any of the parameters (chromosome, position, ref, alt, tissue_type) or explain their meaning, leaving the agent with only the schema's technical constraints but no semantic understanding of what these parameters represent in the context of expression impact analysis.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool analyzes RNA-seq and CAGE predictions for expression changes, which is a specific verb (analyzes) and resource (RNA-seq and CAGE predictions). It distinguishes from siblings by focusing on 'gene expression effects only' and mentions eQTL analysis and expression-related variants. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from similar-sounding siblings like 'predict_variant_effect' or 'explain_variant_impact'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides implied usage guidelines with 'Perfect for: eQTL analysis, expression-related variants' and an example, giving some context about when to use it. However, it doesn't explicitly state when NOT to use it or mention alternatives among the many sibling tools, leaving the agent to infer appropriate usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/taehojo/alphagenome-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server