zenoti-services-get
Retrieve service details by providing the service ID and center ID for accurate service information.
Instructions
Get service details
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| service_id | Yes | ||
| center_id | Yes |
Retrieve service details by providing the service ID and center ID for accurate service information.
Get service details
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| service_id | Yes | ||
| center_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states 'Get service details', omitting any behavioral traits like error handling, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While brief, the description is under-specified rather than concise. It lacks essential details, making it unhelpful despite minimal length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of output schema, annotations, and parameter descriptions, the description is severely incomplete for a tool requiring two mandatory parameters.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the meaning of 'service_id' or 'center_id'. The agent receives no guidance on what these parameters represent.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get service details' is a near tautology of the tool name 'zenoti-services-get'. It does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'zenoti-services-list' or specify what 'details' entails.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'zenoti-services-list' for listing services. No context on prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tacit-code/zenoti-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server