Skip to main content
Glama
sweetrb

apple-mail-mcp

by sweetrb

Related Servers

Alternatives to apple-mail-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants full access to Apple Mail -- read, search, compose, organize, and analyze emails via natural language.
      38
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server bridges AI agents with Apple Mail on macOS, enabling email operations like reading, sending, drafting, searching, and scheduling through natural language, with added features like stable draft IDs and confirmation-gated sending.
      61
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants comprehensive access to Apple Mail accounts, enabling email discovery, reading, flag management, and server-side message retrieval.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Apple Mail that enables Claude to read, search, manage, and compose emails via AppleScript.
      20
      21 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides programmatic access to Apple Mail, enabling AI assistants like Claude to read, send, search, and manage emails on macOS.
      25
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI models to read, search, and send emails via IMAP and SMTP protocols. It supports various providers like Gmail and Outlook, allowing for tasks such as retrieving unread messages, searching by sender, and managing mailbox folders.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 52 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools have distinct purposes and descriptions explicitly cross-reference alternatives (single vs batch, body vs headers vs raw RFC822, search vs list), greatly reducing misselection. Some near-duplicates—health-check vs doctor vs get-sync-status and the eight single/batch pairs—can still be confused, but the guidance is unusually strong.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all names follow verb_noun kebab-case (list-mailboxes, create-rule, batch-delete-messages). Exceptions like 'doctor' and 'health-check' break the pattern slightly, but overall predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    52 tools is far beyond the 3–15 sweet spot; while the domain is broad, many could be consolidated (e.g., single/batch variants, three diagnostic tools, template CRUD vs save/list/get/delete/use). The surface feels heavy and increases selection cost.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle coverage is strong: mailboxes, messages, attachments, rules, templates, smart mailboxes, diagnostics. Minor gaps remain—no copy-message, empty-trash, or draft update/list—but mostly work-aroundable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive