Skip to main content
Glama
swairshah

InputMCP

by swairshah
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to InputMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Feedback Collector MCP

      ceciliomichael
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Collects user feedback with text and image support through an Electron app, allowing AI tools to gather and process user input with customizable prompts and multiple response options.
      1
      9 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • chathook

      kedaya2025
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to prompt users for input directly within the chat UI using MCP's elicitation capabilities, allowing for interactive multi-turn conversations without leaving the conversation interface.
      1
      15 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Little Mouse Pointer

      Fish121380
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to select Windows desktop UI elements, windows, or screen regions via mouse hover, then obtain context through UI Automation, screenshots, and local OCR for MCP-compatible clients.
      2
      MIT

    • AskMeMCP

      thlandgraf
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to request human input through a web interface, allowing them to pause execution and wait for responses via interactive tools like single questions, multiple choice selections, hypothesis challenges, and decision workflows.
      5 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently has consistent naming, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The name 'collect_input' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is too few for most server purposes, as it severely limits functionality and scope. It feels thin and incomplete for handling user input in a robust way.

    Completeness2/5

    The server's purpose appears to be collecting user input, but with only one tool, there are significant gaps. For example, no tools for validating, processing, or managing different input types, making the surface severely incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources