Skip to main content
Glama

sumo_qa_capabilities

Read-onlyIdempotent

Discover sumo-qa's core QA workflows with sample prompts, skills, and outcomes. Quickly explore what the tool can do without replacing the main router.

Instructions

Return a compact, read-only map of sumo-qa's core QA workflows — each with a sample prompt, the skill it routes to, and a one-line outcome. A discovery aid for "what can sumo-qa do?"; does NOT replace the using-sumo-qa entry router or sumo_qa_deciding_approach.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, non-destructive, idempotent. Description adds that it returns a 'compact map' but doesn't detail exact structure or side effects. No contradictions, and description provides additional context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, clear and front-loaded. Every sentence earns its place, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, description is fully sufficient. It explains purpose, usage boundaries, and return content. Mentions relevant sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters, so baseline 4. Description does not need to add param info, but it reinforces the read-only nature. No issues.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns a compact map of core QA workflows with sample prompts, skills, and outcomes. It distinguishes itself from siblings like using_sumo_qa and sumo_qa_deciding_approach by framing itself as a discovery aid.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states it does NOT replace the entry router or deciding_approach tool, providing clear when-not-to-use guidance. Also implies it is for discovering capabilities when asking 'what can sumo-qa do?'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sumithr/sumo-qa'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server